Nov 6, 2009

Milan Kundera

Sur l'avenir, tout le monde se trompe. L'homme ne peut être sûr que du moment présent. Mais est-ce bien vrai ? Peut-il vraiment le connaître, le présent ? Est-il capable de le juger ? Bien sûr que non. Car comment celui qui ne connaît pas l'avenir pourrait-il comprendre le sens du présent ? Si nous ne savons pas vers quel avenir le présent nous mène, comment pourrions-nous dire que ce présent est bon ou mauvais, qu'il mérite notre adhésion, notre méfiance ou notre haine ?
It has been quite a while that I didn’t even bother to write…
It is like a human recession.

In my case I think it is disappointment.

What should I write about anyway?

Politics or whatever we call it these days? How about education? That is a subject worth looking into, especially in a developing country like Lebanon.
How about simply Lebanon???
What should I say about Lebanon? Topics are endless, material is abundant. But motivation lacks.
I am simply disappointed, and fed up with my generation.

We were supposed to bring real change and that is not a random political statement.
We were supposed to eradicate sectarianism.
We were supposed to be one people, one hand, one heart, one soul.

Have you already forgotten the effort we put in order to rebuild this country from scratch?? And I am not only talking about the civil war, I am also talking about the last 2006 war.

So I guess you prefer to party at night and fight during the day. That seems your best option, because it is the option you are choosing.

What happened to our culture? Plastic topics seem to prevail…
What happened to our language and our heritage?
Why can’t you simply invest in what you have?
Why does it seem so necessary for you to imitate other Arab countries?
When did we exactly become stones?
When did modernism and culture become a synonym of ignorance and superficialities?
What happened to our children? They speak politics at the age of 3, instead of playing with toys and running in playgrounds…

I don’t want to leave, because you cannot take away my identity…
But I don’t want to stay; I don’t want my future to be between those virtual walls.
I want to keep learning, keep seeing and discovering new things…
My ambitions are unlimited and my love is endless…

You can’t take my country away from me…



Saria


Gorbachev outlines his CCTF blueprint for climate change action

GCI Founding President Mikhail Gorbachev (Picture courtesy of Anne Dokter)
GCI Founding President Mikhail Gorbachev (Picture courtesy of Anne Dokter)
During his keynote address to the Club of Rome General Assembly in Amsterdam on 26 October, GCI Founding President Mikhail Gorbachev announced his Climate Change Task Force (CCTF) blueprint for a global emergency response to the climate crisis and called for heads of states to come personally to Copenhagen. GCI president Alexander Likhotal read the statement to an audience that included Queen Beatrix of Netherlands, Amsterdam Mayor Job Cohen and other officials.

Former Netherlands Prime Minister, Ruud Lubbers, introduced Mr. Gorbachev complimenting him on his long-lasting commitment to the sustainability and for his ground-breaking work as one of the founding fathers of the Earth Charter. Following Mr. Gorbachev, the former President of Chile, current President of the Club of Madrid and task force member President Ricardo Lagos endorsed the words of President Gorbachev and the declaration. Mr. Gorbachev, Mr. Lagos and Mr. Lubbers then joined Club of Rome President Marlin Lees for a panel discussion on the need for urgent action on climate change at the national and international levels.

Other notable names in the field of environment and climate change on hand at the even included, NASA Scientist James Hansen, and executive director of Stockholm Environment Institute Johan Rockstrom and Chair of the California Air Resources Board Mary Nichols.

GCI President Alexander Likhotal, Secretary-General of the Club of Rome. Martin Lees, GCI Founding President Mikhail Gorbachev and the Mayor of Amsterdam Job Cohen
GCI President Alexander Likhotal, Secretary-General of the Club of Rome. Martin Lees, GCI Founding President Mikhail Gorbachev and the Mayor of Amsterdam Job Cohen
The Climate Change Task Force consolidates the efforts of organizations like the Club of Rome, Club of Madrid, the Nobel Peace Laureates and the World Political Forum. It is made up of international public figures and experts including Sir David King and Jean-Michel Cousteau. The inaugural meeting of the task force took place in Geneva on 5 October in the presence of United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and his team.

Over 600 people took part in the 2009 Club of Rome General Assembly that focused on energy efficiency, climate stabilization and economic recovery in the run-up to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen later this year.

The Club of Rome is a global think tank that has been working on comprehensive solutions to the most pressing challenges of modern society since 1968.

Task force members Ian Dunlop and Mohan Munashinge gave keynote speeches and master classes during the two-day event.

The meeting was held in Amsterdam, one of the top 10 sustainable cities in the European Union. “The city encourages sustainability, works so that public buildings become climate neutral, reduce energy and water consumption,” said, Mayor Cohen. The city also promotes solar and wind energies and is well known for its use of bicycle transportation. 

The CCTF has three clear main objectives:
(1) To urge governments to maximise the opportunities Copenhagen offers for a strong and coherent climate deal.
(2) To "recalibrate" the international response to climate change in line with the danger posed to human security and development; and
(3) To engage civil society in the search for appropriate and adequate solutions to the challenges of climate change, building the critical mass for a deep-rooted societal change necessary to contain and then to reverse the effects of climate change.

To read the full statement, click here.
 



La Banque mondiale lance le programme « MultiCat »

Un nouveau programme d’émission d’obligations pour se couvrir contre les catastrophes aide les gouvernements à s’assurer contre les catastrophes naturelles
Disponible en: العربيةEspañol中文Englishрусский
Communiqué de presse n°:2010/100


Personnes à contacter :
Diane Cashman (+1 202) 458 8771dcashman@worldbank.org
Ivan Zelenko (+1202) 473 5445 izelenko@worldbank.org
Issam Abousleiman (+1 202) 458 0865abousleiman@worldbank.org


WASHINGTON, 19 octobre 2009 — La Banque mondiale (Banque internationale pour la reconstruction et le développement) a annoncé aujourd’hui le lancement du programme MultiCat, un programme d’émission d’obligations qui permet aux États et autres organismes publics d’avoir accès aux marchés financiers internationaux pour s’assurer contre les risques de catastrophes naturelles. Pour la première fois, un programme est spécifiquement mis au point pour aider les gouvernements des pays en développement à accéder à une couverture d’assurance sur les marchés financiers.
Le programme MultiCat permet à ceux qui y participent d’acquérir une assurance pertinente pour des risques multiples, plusieurs pays et régions. Les tremblements de terre, les inondations, les ouragans et les tempêtes de vent sont les différents types d’intempéries contre lesquelles il est possible de s’assurer. Le programme met en place un cadre opérationnel, juridique et de documentation commun pour l’émission d’obligations « catastrophes » futures qui porteront elles aussi le label MultiCat.
Le programme se distingue par sa flexibilité et s’accommode d’une large gamme de structures, notamment la mise en commun de risques multiples, pour tirer parti des avantages liés à la diversification. L’un des principaux objectifs visés par la Banque mondiale à travers le programme est d’aider ses clients à obtenir un bon rapport coût-efficacité, en offrant aux investisseurs la possibilité de diversifier leurs portefeuilles par l’investissement dans des actifs indépendants d’autres actifs et en élargissant la base existante d’investisseurs détenteurs d’obligations « catastrophes ».
« Le programme MultiCat est un important pas en avant vers l’accroissement de la liquidité, notamment en réduisant les coûts de transaction et en offrant aux investisseurs qui détiennent des titres « catastrophes » les avantages de la diversification au regard des pays et des risques, » affirme Kenneth Lay, Vice-président et Trésorier de la Banque mondiale. « Nous pensons que cela se traduira par un bien meilleur accès à la couverture et à des conditions nettement plus bénéfiques pour les gouvernements et les autres organismes publics qui auront recours au programme pour gérer les risques de catastrophes, ce qui réduira l’impact financier et économique des catastrophes naturelles ».
C’est dans le cadre d’une collaboration étroite avec le Gouvernement du Mexique, l’un des émetteurs souverains les plus expérimentés du marché des obligations « catastrophes », que la Banque mondiale a élaboré le programme MultiCat. Le succès remporté par le Mexique au moyen de MultiCat en procédant à l’émission publique d’une série de titres d’un montant total de 290 millions de dollars constitue la  première du genre.
« Le partenariat établi entre le Mexique et la Banque mondiale au titre du programme MultiCat nous a permis, pour la première fois, de transférer efficacement sur le marché la couverture d’un ensemble de risques tels que les tremblements de terre et les ouragans ; et nous sommes très satisfaits des résultats obtenus, » déclare Alejandro Werner, Vice-ministre des Finances du Gouvernement du Mexique. « Nous sommes par ailleurs très fiers d’avoir contribué à la création de ce programme qui permet de donner à d’autres membres de la Banque mondiale l’accès à un nouvel ensemble d’outils de gestion des risques liés aux catastrophes ».
Le Département de la Trésorerie de la Banque mondiale s’est occupé du montage de cette opération et a désigné Swiss Re Capital Markets Corporation et Goldman Sachs comme co-chefs de file et responsables conjoints, et s’est attaché les services de Munich Re comme conseiller.
Le programme MultiCat élargit la gamme d’instruments proposés par la Banque mondiale pour financer la couverture contre les risques de catastrophe, y compris l’option de tirage différé en cas de catastrophe qui est une ligne de crédit permettant d’accéder directement à des financements à la suite d’une catastrophe naturelle ; et des services d’intermédiation pour la protection contre les risques climatiques et le Mécanisme d’assurance contre les risques de catastrophe dans les Caraïbes.
À propos de la Banque mondiale et du Département de la Trésorerie
La Banque mondiale est une coopérative de développement internationale appartenant à 186 pays membres. Elle a pour mission d’aider ses membres à afficher durablement une croissance économique équitable et à trouver des solutions efficaces aux problèmes régionaux et mondiaux urgents qui compromettent le développement économique et la viabilité écologique, afin de faire reculer la pauvreté et d’améliorer le niveau de vie des populations du monde. Le Département de la Trésorerie de la Banque mondiale mène des activités de financement et administre le portefeuille d’investissement de l’institution. Il fournit également des services bancaires, financiers et de gestion d’actifs aux membres de la Banque mondiale et à d’autres organismes du secteur public.




Permanent URL for this page: http://go.worldbank.org/6TOPEDK270

Nov 5, 2009

Women in Ancient Egypt



Unlike the position of women in most other ancient civilizations, including that of Greece, the Egyptian woman seems to have enjoyed the same legal and economic rights as the Egyptian man - at least in theory. This notion is reflected in Egyptian art and historical inscriptions.
It is uncertain why these rights existed for the woman in Egypt but no where else in the ancient world. It may well be that such rights were ultimately related to the theoretical role of the king in Egyptian society. If the pharaoh was the personification of Egypt, and he represented the corporate personality of the Egyptian state, then men and women might not have been seen in their familiar relationships, but rather, only in regard to this royal center of society.
Since Egyptian national identity would have derived from all people sharing a common relationship with the king, then in this relationship, which all men and women shared equally, they were--in a sense--equal to each other. This is not to say that Egypt was an egalitarian society. It was not. Legal distinctions in Egypt were apparently based much more upon differences in the social classes, rather than differences in gender. Rights and privileges were not uniform from one class to another, but within the given classes, it seems that equal economic and legal rights were, for the most part, accorded to both men and women.
Most of the textual and archaeological evidence for the role of women that survives from prior to the New Kingdom pertains to the elite, not the common folk. At this time, it is the elite, for the most part, who leave written records or who can afford tombs that contain such records. However, from the New Kingdom onward, and certainly by the Ptolemaic Period, such evidence pertains more and more to the non-elite, i.e., to women of the middle and lower classes. Actually, the bulk of the evidence for the economic freedom of Egyptian women derives from the Ptolemaic Period.
The Greek domination of Egypt, which began with the conquest of Alexander the Great in 332 B.C., did not sweep away Egyptian social and political institutions. Both Egyptian and Greek systems of law and social traditions existed side-by-side in Egypt at that time. Greeks functioned within their system and Egyptians within theirs. Mixed parties of Greeks and Egyptians making contractual agreements or who were forced into court over legal disputes would choose which of the two legal systems in which they would base their settlements. Ironically, while the Egyptians were the subjugated people of their Greek rulers, Egyptian women, operating under the Egyptian system, had more privileges and civil rights than the Greek women living in the same society, but who functioned under the more restrictive Greek social and legal system.
WOMEN'S LEGAL RIGHTS:
The Egyptian woman's rights extended to all the legally defined areas of society. From the bulk of the legal documents, we know that women could manage and dispose of private property, including: land, portable goods, servants, slaves, livestock, and money (when it existed), as well as financial instruments (i.e., endowments and annuities). A woman could administer all her property independently and according to her free will. She could conclude any kind of legal settlement. She could appear as a contracting partner in a marriage contract or a divorce contract; she could execute testaments; she could free slaves; she could make adoptions. She was entitled to sue at law. It is highly significant that a woman in Egypt could do all of the above and initiate litigation in court freely without the need of a male representative. This amount of freedom was at variance with that of the Greek woman who required a designated male, called a kourios, to represent or stand for her in all legal contracts and proceedings. This male was her husband, father or brother.
WOMEN'S PROPERTY RIGHTS:
There were several ways for an Egyptian woman to acquire possessions and real property. Most frequently, she received it as gifts or as an inheritance from her parents or husband, or else, she received it through purchases--with goods which she earned either through employment, or which she borrowed. Under Egyptian property law, a woman had claim to one-third of all the community property in her marriage, i.e. the property which accrued to her husband and her only after they were married. When a woman brought her own private property to a marriage (e.g., as a dowry), this apparently remained hers, although the husband often had the free use of it. However, in the event of divorce her property had to be returned to her, in addition to any divorce settlement that might be stipulated in the original marriage contract.
A wife was entitled to inherit one-third of that community property on the death of her husband, while the other two-thirds was divided among the children, followed up by the brothers and sisters of the deceased. To circumvent this possibility and to enable life to receive either a larger part of the share, or to allow her to dispose of all the property, a husband could do several things:
1) In the Middle Kingdom, he could draw up an imyt-pr, a "house document," which was a legal unilateral deed for donating property. As a living will, it was made and perhaps executed while the husband was still alive. In this will, the husband would assign to his wife what he wished of his own private property, i.e., what he acquired before his marriage. An example of this is the imyt-pr of Wah from el-Lahun. 2) If there were no children, and the husband did not wish his brothers and sisters to receive two-thirds of the community property, he could legally adopt his wife as his child and heir and bequeath all the property to her. Even if he had other children, he could still adopt his wife, so that, as his one of his legal offspring, she would receive some of the two-thirds share, in addition to her normal one-third share of the community property.
A woman was free to bequeath property from her husband to her children or even to her own brothers and sisters (unless there was some stipulation against such in her husband's will). One papyrus tells us how a childless woman, who after she inherited her husband's estate, raised the three illegitimate children who were born to him and their female household slave (such liaisons were fairly common in the Egyptian household and seem to have borne no social stigma). She then married the eldest illegitimate step-daughter to her younger brother, whom she adopted as her son, that they might receive the entire inheritance.
A woman could also freely disinherit children of her private property, i.e., the property she brought to her marriage or her share of the community property. She could selectively bequeath that property to certain children and not to others. Such action is recorded in the Will of Naunakht.
WOMEN IN CONTRACTS:
Women in Egypt were consistently concluding contracts, including: marriage and divorce settlements, engagements of wet-nurses, purchases of property, even arrangements for self-enslavement. Self-enslavement in Egypt was actually a form of indentured servitude. Although self-enslavement appears to have been illegal in Egypt, it was practiced by both men and women. To get around the illegality, the servitude was stipulated only for a limited number of years, although it was usually said to be "99 years."
Under self-enslavement, women often technically received a salary for their labor. Two reasons for which a woman might be forced into such an arrangement are:
(1) as payment to a creditor to satisfy bad debts;
(2) to be assured of one's provisions and financial security, for which a person might even pay a monthly fee, as though they were receiving a service. However, this fee would equal the salary that the provider had to pay for her labor; thus, no "money" would be exchanged. Since this service was a legal institution, then a contract was drawn up stipulating the conditions and the responsibilities of the involved parties.
In executing such an arrangement, a woman could also include her children and grandchildren, alive or unborn. One such contract of a woman who bound herself to the temple of Saknebtynis states:
The female servant (so & so) has said before my master, Saknebtynis, the great god, 'I am your servant, together with my children and my children's children. I shall not be free in your precinct forever and ever. You will protect me; you will keep me safe; you will guard me. You will keep me sound; you will protect me from every demon, and I will pay you 1-1/4 kita of copper . . . until the completion of 99 years, and I will give it to your priests monthly.'
If such women married male "slaves," the status of their children depended on the provisions of their contracts with their owners.
WOMEN BEFORE THE BAR:
Egyptian women had the right to bring lawsuits against anyone in open court, and there was no gender-based bias against them, and we have many cases of women winning their claims. A good example of this fact is found in the Inscription of Mes. This inscription is the actual court record of a long and drawn- out private land dispute which occurred in the New Kingdom. Significantly, the inscription shows usfour things: (1) women could manage property, and they could inherit trusteeship of property; (2) women could institute litigation (and appeal to the court of the vizier); (3) women were awarded legal decisions (and had decisions reversed on appeal); (4) women acted as witnesses before a court of law.
However, based upon the Hermopolis Law Code of the third century B.C., the freedom of women to share easily with their male relatives in the inheritance of landed property was perhaps restricted somewhat. According to the provisions of theHermopolis Law Code, where an executor existed, the estate of the deceased was divided up into a number of parcels equal to the number of children of the deceased, both alive and dead. Thereafter, each male child (or that child's heirs), in order of birth, took his pick of the parcels. Only when the males were finished choosing, were the female children permitted to choose their parcels (in chronological order). The male executor was permitted to claim for himself parcels of any children and heirs who predeceased the father without issue. Female executors were designated when there were no sons to function as such. However, the code is specific that--unlike male executors--they could not claim the parcels of any dead children.
Still, it is not appropriate to compare the provisions of the Hermopolis Law Code to the Inscription of Mes, since the latter pertains to the inheritance of an office, i.e., a trusteeship of land, and not to the land itself. Indeed, the system of dividing the estate described in the l aw code--or something similar to it- -might have existed at least as early as the New Kingdom, since the Instructions of Any contains the passage, "Do not say, 'My grandfather has a house. An enduring house, it is called' (i.e., don't brag of any future inheritance), for when you take your share with your brothers, your portion may only be a storehouse."
FEMALE LITERACY:
It is uncertain, generally, how literate the Egyptian woman was in any period. Baines and Eyre suggest very low figures for the percentage of the literate in the Egypt population, i.e., only about 1% in the Old Kingdom (i.e., 1 in 20 or 30 males). Other Egyptologists would dispute these estimates, seeing instead an amount at about 5-10% of the population. In any event, it is certain that the rate of literacy of Egyptian women was well behind that of men from the Old Kingdom through the Late Period.
Lower class women, certainly were illiterate; middle class women and the wives of professional men, perhaps less so. The upper class probably had a higher rate of literate women. In the Old and Middle Kingdoms, middle and upper class women are occasionally found in the textual and archaeological record with administrative titles that are indicative of a literate ability. In the New Kingdom the frequency at which these titles occur declines significantly, suggesting an erosion in the rate of female literacy at that time (let alone the freedom to engage in an occupation). However, in a small number of tomb representations of the New Kingdom, certain noblewomen are associated with scribal palettes, suggesting a literate ability. Women are also recorded as the senders and recipients of a small number of letters in Egypt (5 out of 353). However, in these cases we cannot be certain that they personally penned or read these letters, rather than employed the services of professional scribes.
Many royal princesses at court had private tutors, and most likely, these tutors taught them to read and write. Royal women of the Eighteenth Dynasty probably were regularly trained, since many were functioning leaders. Since royal princesses would have been educated, it then seems likely that the daughters of the royal courtiers were similarly educated. In the inscriptions, we occasionally do find titles of female scribes among the middle class from the Middle Kingdom on, especially after the Twenty- sixth Dynasty, when the rate of literacy increased throughout the country. The only example of a female physician in Egypt occurs in the Old Kingdom. Scribal instruction was a necessary first step toward medical training.
WOMEN IN PUBLIC:
The Egyptian woman in general was free to go about in public; she worked out in the fields and in estate workshops. Certainly, she did not wear a veil, which is first documented among the ancient Assyrians (perhaps reflecting a tradition of the ancient semitic- speaking people of the Syrian and Arabian Deserts). However, it was perhaps unsafe for an Egyptian woman to venture far from her town alone.
Ramesses III boasts in one inscription, "I enabled the woman of Egypt to go her own way, her journeys being extended where she wanted, without any person assaulting her on the road." A different view of the traveling women is found in the Instructions of Any, "Be on your guard against a woman from abroad, who is not known in town, do not have sex with her." So by custom, there might have been a reputation of impiousness or looseness associated with a woman traveling alone in Egypt.
Despite the legal freedom of women to travel about, folk custom or tradition may have discouraged that. So, e.g., earlier in the Old Kingdom, Ptahhotep would write, "If you desire to make a friendship last in a house to which you have access to its master as a brother or friend in any place where you might enter, beware of approaching the women. It does not go well with a place where that is done."
However, the theme of this passage might actually refer to violating personal trust and not the accessibility of women, per se. However, mores and values apparently changed by the New Kingdom. The love poetry of that era, as well as certain letters, are quite frank about the public accessibility and freedom of women.
WOMEN'S OCCUPATIONS:
In general, the work of the upper and middle class woman was limited to the home and the family. This was not due to an inferior legal status, but was probably a consequence of her customary role as mother and bearer of children, as well as the public role of the Egyptian husbands and sons who functioned as the executors of the mortuary cults of their deceased parents. It was the traditional role of the good son to bury his parents, support their funerary cult, to bring offerings regularly to the tombs, and to recite the offering formula. Because women are not regularly depicted doing this in Egyptian art, they probably did not often assume this role. When a man died without a surviving son to preserve his name and present offerings, then it was his brother who was often depicted in the art doing so. Perhaps because it was the males who were regularly entrusted with this important religious task, that they held the primary position in public life.
As far as occupations go, in the textual sources upper class woman are occasionally described as holding an office, and thus they might have executed real jobs. Clearly, though, this phenomenon was more prevalent in the Old Kingdom than in later periods (perhaps due to the lower population at that time). In Wente's publication of Egyptian letters, he notes that of 353 letters known from Egypt, only 13 provide evidence of women functioning with varying degrees of administrative authority.
On of the most exalted administrative titles of any woman who was not a queen was held by a non-royal women named Nebet during the Sixth Dynasty, who was entitled, "Vizier, Judge and Magistrate." She was the wife of the nomarch of Coptos and grandmother of King Pepi I.
However, it is possible that the title was merely honorific and granted to her posthumously. Through the length of Egyptian history, we see many titles of women which seem to reflect real administrative authority, including one woman entitled, "Second Prophet (i.e. High Priest) of Amun" at the temple of Karnak, which was, otherwise, a male office. Women could and did hold male administrative positions in Egypt. However, such cases are few, and thus appear to be the exceptions to tradition. Given the relative scarcity of such, they might reflect extraordinary individuals in unusual circumstances.
Women functioned as leaders, e.g., kings, dowager queens and regents, even as usurpers of rightful heirs, who were either their step-sons or nephews. We find women as nobility and landed gentry managing both large and small estates, e.g., the lady Tchat who started as overseer of a nomarch's household with a son of middling status; married the nomarch; was elevated, and her son was also raised in status. Women functioned as middle class housekeepers, servants, fieldhands, and all manner of skilled workers inside the household and in estate-workshops.
Women could also be national heroines in Egypt. Extraordinary cases include: Queen Ahhotep of the early Eighteenth Dynasty. She was renowned for saving Egypt during the wars of liberation against the Hyksos, and she was praised for rallying the Egyptian troops and crushing rebellion in Upper Egypt at a critical juncture of Egyptian history. In doing so, she received Egypt's highest military decoration at least three times, the Order of the Fly. Queen Hatshepsut, as a ruling king, was actually described as going on military campaign in Nubia. Eyewitness reports actually placed her on the battlefield weighing booty and receiving the homage of defeated rebels.
WOMEN AND CRIME:
These ordinary and extraordinary roles are not the only ones in which we see Egyptian women cast in ancient Egypt. We also see Egyptian women as the victims of crime (and rape); also as the perpetrators of crime, as adulteresses and even as convicts.
Women criminals certainly existed, although they do not appear frequently in the historical record. A woman named Nesmut was implicated in a series of robberies of the royal tombs in the Valley of the Kings during the Twentieth Dynasty. Examples of women convicts are also known.
According to one Brooklyn Museum papyrus from the Middle Kingdom, a woman was incarcerated at the prison at Thebes because she fled her district to dodge the corvee service on a royal estate. Most of the concubines and lesser wives involved in the harim conspiracy against Ramesses III were convicted and had their noses and ears cut off, while others were invited to commit suicide. Another woman is indicated among the lists of prisoners from a prison at el-Lahun. However, of the prison lists we have, the percentage of women's names is very small compared to those of men, and this fact may be significant.
MARRIAGE
Marrige was a very important part af ancient Egyptian society. Some people say it was almost a duty to get married. Husbands could marry more than one wife, and people of close relations (first cousins, brothers and sisters, ect.) could also wed one another. For the most part, however, incest was frowned upon, except in the royal family, where incest was used to safeguard the dynastic succession.
There was no age limit as to when people could be married, but generally a girl did not get married until she had begun to menstruate at about the age of 14. Some documents state that girls may have been married at the age of eight or nine, and a mummy of an eleven year-old wife has also been found. Marriage required no religious or legal ceremony. There were no special bridal clothes, no exchange of rings, no change of names to indicate marriage, and no word meaning wedding.
A girl became universally acknowledged as a wife after she physically left the protection of her father's house and entered her new home. The new husband in no way became the new wife's legal guardian. The wife kept her independence, and still kept control her own assets. Although the husband usually controlled any joint property obtained during the marriage it was acknowledged that a share of this belonged to the wife; if and when the marriage ended, she could collect he share. If the husband died while married, the wife got one-third of her husband's property. re-marriage after widowhood was very common, and some grave sites indicate three or four marriages between one person.
Divorce was a private matter, and for the most part, the government did not interfere, unless upon the request of the "divorcees". Almost any excuse could be used to end a marriage, and an alliance could be terminated at will. Anyone who had drawn up a marriage contract would have to honor those terms, and those who hadn't could, if they wished, could invest in a legal document. Legal cases, however, were very unusual; most marriages ended with the wife moving back to the matrimonial home, returning to her family, therefore setting both parties free to marry again.
The more intimate parts of married life were very important to the Egyptians. They saw life as a cycle of birth, death, and rebirth. Much of their theology was based on the "cycle-principal". Sexual intercourse was a very important part of this cycle, and the Egyptians were not modest about sex, like today's society. The Egyptians, unlike us, were not concerned with the spiritual part of the afterlife, but rather about potency and fertility. Consequently, false penises were put on the mummified bodies of men, and artificial nipples were put on the mummified bodies of women. Both of these were designed to be fully functional in the afterlife.
Pregnancy was very important to ancient Egyptian women. A fertile woman was a successful woman. By becoming pregnant, women gained the respect of society, approval from their husbands, and the admiration of their less-fortunate sisters and sterile friends. Men needed to prove their "manliness" by fathering as many children as the possibly could, and babies were seen as a reason for boasting.
Although the mechanism of menstruation was not fully understood the significance of missing periods was clear, and many Egyptian women were able to determine if the were pregnant or not. If women were not sure, they could go to a doctor, who would perform a detailed examination of the woman's breasts eyes, and skin. If a woman was sterile, and could not produce babies, many men solved this problem by divorcing them. But this treatment was harsh, and for the most part, frowned upon. A more publicly-accepted way of solving the problem of sterility was adoption, and due to the short life expectancy and high birth rate, there was always a supply of orphaned children.
A mother named her child immediately following birth, thereby making sure the child would have a name in the afterlife in the unfortunate case of a miscarriage. The Egyptians feared the "second-death" even more than the first one. The second-death was the complete obliteration of all earthly memory, which is why names were so important to the Egyptians. Spells were painted on the coffin of the deceased to ensure nobody would forget him or her. Many people say the Egyptian time was a good time to live. It seems that it was, at least, a nice place for women to live. It was filled with equality for them, and gave them some basic rights that today's society is lacking.



The First Women Doctor in Ancient Egypt
Like mathematics and astronomy, medicine was quite well-developed in the Old Kingdom. Many of the physicians sunu were attached to the royal palace. Among them, there were degrees of specialization. Specialists included the physician of the eyes of the Great House sunu irty per-aa: an oculist. Other physicians were also described as dentists, entereo-gastrits, etc.
Medical instructions and precepts were written down as early as the Fifth Dynasty (2465-2322 B.C.). In the Vizier (Prime Minister) Wash-Ptahs tomb at Saqqara, an event is recorded in which the King, Neferirkare Kakai (2446-2436 B.C.), ordered the chief of physicians to bring books with which to cure an illness from which his high official suffered. Some medical works of later times - such as the so-called Edwin Smith Papyrus, for example - have been credited with great antiquity.
In 1930, in a text entitled Excavations at Giza I, 1929-1930, Dr. Selim Hassan published the stela of Peseshet, which was discovered within an Old Kingdom tomb{3}. Dr. Hassan translated Peseshets title as follows: "Overseer of the doctors." In fact, the word imyt-r, "overseer," does exist for the feminine gender. Moreover, the word swnu (sunu), "doctor," is written in the text with the grammatical ending for the feminine gender, the symbol for "t". It is clear, then, that Peseshet was a woman doctor (swnwt) and the director (imyt-r) of the women doctors (swnwwt). The fact that the word swnu, "physician," was used declares that this title involved a question of medicine. That the word "swnwt" was used indicates a woman physician.
Lady Peseshet had another title which reads as follows: imyt-r hm(wt)-ka, that is "woman director of the soul-priestesses." The soul-priests (or priestesses) were appointed to tend the funerary cults of private persons. As we know, women in Egyptian society enjoy high social and professional status like men. All professions were open to educated women and men, including the clergy, administration, business, and medicine, among other fields.
Apparently There was a body of female physicians in Ancient Egypt during the Old Kingdom and Lady Peseshet was their director. The contemporary problem of exlucing women in special professions was absent in Ancient Egypt.
There were more than a hundred prominent female physicians in Ancient Egypt. In contrast, we do not know of any female physicians in Mesoptamian history. The medical historiography must include the fact that Lady Peseshet was indeed the first female physician in Africa and in world history. This is a fact absolutely verifiable: historical scholarship in Europe, in Africa, and across the globe has not previously brough this important historical moment to the consciousness of humanity.