Jun 25, 2009

INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP - NEW BRIEFINGGuinea-Bissau: Beyond Rule of the Gun Dakar/Brussels, 25 June 2009: Without outside help to end military involvement in politics and impunity, it may be impossible to halt Guinea-Bissau’s slide into further violence.Guinea-Bissau: Beyond Rule of the Gun*, the latest policy briefing from the International Crisis Group, warns that the killings of General Tagme (the chief of defence staff) and President Vieira in March, as well as the recent assassinations of opposition leaders and former ministers, are an indication the democratic process cannot cope. The military’s use of force has overwhelmed state institutions. Both the political elites and the international community must send a strong message condemning the widespread abuses committed by the armed forces.“The commission of inquiry established to investigate the killings is likely to be fatally weakened by a lack of political will to uncover the truth. There is a widespread fear of intimidation and retaliation”, says Mohamed Jalloh, Crisis Group Analyst. “Without international involvement, it is highly unlikely that the true culprits will be identified. This reflects the inability of the justice system to counter impunity. It is not able to deal with the widespread criminality linked to drug trafficking that has engulfed the country”.The international community should capitalise on the 28 June presidential election to signal that the continued use of force and human rights abuses are unacceptable and will entail consequences. Though the presidential election represents an opportunity to end the present deadlock, there is no guarantee that it will be sufficient to break the cycle of military involvement in politics. The international community condemned the recent assassinations but at the same time it has approved the interim government and the planned election. No president of Guinea-Bissau has successfully completed the constitutionally-mandated five-year term since the country’s return to multi-party rule in 1994. And General Tagme is the third chief of defence staff to be assassinated in nine years. Political leaders cannot stand up to the military without support. Guinea-Bissau’s effort to reform its security system needs to be enhanced by improved international coordination and creation of a national commission with enhanced autonomy to provide domestic ownership of the process. “There is no guarantee that Sunday’s presidential election will be enough to break the cycle of military involvement in politics”, says Francois Grignon, Crisis Group’s Africa Program Director. “Both Guinea-Bissau’s democratic forces and the international community have to make stronger efforts to deal with military power. Otherwise there will be neither real political stability nor a viable democratic process”.

To support our work in Africa and around the world, please click here.*Read the full Crisis Group briefing on our website: http://www.crisisgroup.org Contacts: Andrew Stroehlein (Brussels) +32 (0) 2 541 1635 Kimberly Abbott (Washington) +1 202 785 1601To contact Crisis Group media please click here

The International Crisis Group (Crisis Group) is an independent, non-profit, non-governmental organisation covering some 60 crisis-affected countries and territories across four continents, working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict.

training for bloggers

The Euromed Anna Lindh Foundation for Dialogue between Cultures is organizing between the 27th and 28th of July the first phase of the Hyperlink Project, “the ALF Euromed Bloggers Training on Intercultural Dialogue” on the margin of the campaign Restore Trust – Rebuild Bridges which was launched by the Anna Lindh Foundation and the Alliance of Civilizations to encourage a culture of peace and coexistence in the Euro-Mediterranean Region.The “the ALF Euromed Bloggers Training on Intercultural Dialogue” aims at providing 20 Euromed bloggers with an interactive 2 days training about intercultural dialogue, and Informing them about the Anna Lindh Foundation, its work, its. The project also would like to contribute in building a network of bloggers who believe in the necessity of Restoring Trust and Rebuilding Bridges and who are able to duplicate the messages as a starting point to more comprehensive programs with bloggers. The training is designed to result in conducting an online campaign to support Restore Trust and Rebuilding Bridges by associating the bloggers community in the region to the values of coexistence and culture of peace.“The ALF Euromed Bloggers Training on Intercultural Dialogue” will take place in Luxembourg in cooperation with the ALF Head of Network in Luxembourg, the Abbey of Neumunster Cultural Centre on the 27th, 28th July 2009. The training targets influential bloggers from the 43 Euromed countries who share the values of dialogue and coexistence, and are committed to promote mutual understanding between the countries of the region. The chosen 20 bloggers will be given the title of Cyber Ambassadors for Dialogue and would be asked to participate through there blogs in the one shot online campaign on the 18th of September on Restore Trust – Rebuild Bridges, in order to encourage exchanges between people from different communities, promoting a culture of mutual respect, reconciliation, non-violent conflict resolution and peaceful coexistence inside and between the 43 member countries of the Euro-Med Region.The training will be delivered by 2 highly professional trainers, one from the north and one from the south of the region. The methodology of the training will try to combine between plenary informative presentations, tools and games used in non-formal education on intercultural dialogue, and working groups to design the online campaign. The training will also include a Cultural Night where the participants will have the opportunity to discover each others cultures more closely. There will be also a Blog Souk where the participants can present there blogs and there blogging experiences and how intercultural dialogue is treated in their local blogs. If you are a blogger yourself or know any influential bloggers from your country you would like to recommend, please send the details of your blog and the contact information of the person in charge of the blog to sarah.zaaimi@bibalex.org before the 30th of June.Please note that the Anna Lindh Foundation will cover the total costs of transportation, accommodation and meals for the selected applications.

Sarah Zaaimi

The Anna Lindh Foundation
صوت الشباب: اغتنموا الفرصة وشاركوا في الديمقراطية

ارفع صوتك، شارك العالم بأفكارك وانخرط في الديمقراطيةمن خلال إرسال مقالك عن الديمقراطية والحصول على تذكرة مجانية لأكبر تجمع للديمقراطية ونشطاء حقوق الإنسان في العالم وذلك في جاكارتا عاصمة إندونيسيا في عام 2010.يسر حركة الشباب العالمية للديمقراطية (www.wymd.org) وهي جزء من حركة الديمقراطية العالمية (www.wmd.org) الاعلان عن انطلاق مسابقتها لافضل مقال عن الديمقراطية في العالم. خمسة عشر فائزا وفائزة من كل العالم (ثلاث من كل اقليم من اقاليم العالم: آسيا، وسط / شرق أوروبا وأوراسيا، الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا، أمريكا اللاتينية والبحر الكاريبي، وأفريقيا جنوب الصحراء الكبرى) سيتم دعوتهم للمشاركة في التجمع السادس لحركة الديمقراطية العالمية في عاصمة إندونيسيا جاكارتا في 2010.
أسئلةتتم ممارسة الديمقراطية بعدة طرق وفي سياقات مختلفة. وإننا نؤمن بوجود جوهر عالمي لمبادئ الديمقراطية وتطلعاتها والتي يشترك بها الجميع وتتجاوز اختلافاتنا: اختلاف الثقافات واللغات وحتى الطعام. الهدف من هذه المسابقة هو تسليط الضوء على المشاركات الشخصية في الديمقراطية من خلال تعزيز التفكير النقدي حول دور الشباب في الديمقراطية، وربط الشباب مع حركات شبابية أوسع. تهدف الأسئلة المطروحة في الاسفل إلى حفز الشباب للكتابة عن وجهة نظرهم وتجربتهم الخاصة حول الديمقراطية وفهمهم للديمقراطية والنشاط الديمقراطي.
يجب ان تتطرق المقالات لواحد أو أكثر من الأسئلة التالية:
- ماهي مساحات الديمقراطية المتوفرة للشباب في مجتمعك؟ ماهي مبادئ الديمقراطية في مجتمعك؟ و كيف تشارك/ تشاركي فيها؟
- كيف تساعد الديمقراطية في معالجة همومك الشخصية أو هموم مجتمعك (كالفقر، والحصول على التعليم، والأوبئة، والتمييز وغيرها من الأمور)؟ كيف يمكنك والأشخاص في مجتمعك معالجة هذه المشاكل؟
- اشرح كيف أن حدثا معينا أو حالة معينة غيرت تصورك عن الديمقراطية؟
التسليمالرجاء تسليم المقالات قبل يوم 15 أيلول 2009، وذلك عن طريق البريد الألكتروني، وعلى شكل ملف "word" أو "PDF" مرفق. يرجى إدراج المعلومات التالية بواسطة البريد الالكتروني (الاسم الكامل، والعمر، والجنس، والعنوان ورقم الهاتف أو الجوال)، وإرساله للعنوان الخاص بمنطقتك.يمكن للمقال أن يكون باللغة العربية أو الانكليزية أو الفرنسية أو البرتغالية أو الروسية أو الاسبانية. وأن لا تكون المقالة أكثر من 2000 كلمة ويكون عمر المشارك مابين 18 و 30 سنة.

منطقة الشرق الأوسط وشمال إفريقيا يرجى الإرسال للبريد الالكتروني التالي
WYMD.MENA@GMAIL.COM

· أسيا
WYMD.ASIA@GMAIL.COM · وسط / شرق أوروبا وأوراسيا WYMD.EURASIA@GMAIL.COM·الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا WYMD.MENA@GMAIL.COM· أمريكا اللاتينية والبحر الكاريبي WYMD.LAC@GMAIL.COM· أفريقيا جنوب الصحراء الكبرى WYMD.AFRICA@GMAIL.COMيتم استقبال المقال على فاكس رقم (+1.202.378.9889) مع إدراج معلوماتك الشخصية في الصفحة الخارجية للفاكس.
الجدول الزمني· حزيران 2009- الشروع بمسابقة افضل مقال.· 15 أيلول 2009– أخر موعد لتسليم المقالات.· 18 تشرين أول 2009– الإعلان عن الفائزين الاقليميين.· كانون أول 2009– سيتم نشر المقالات الفائزة على الموقع الالكتروني.· 11-14 نيسان 2010– التجمع السادس لحركة الشباب العاليمة للديمقراطية.
· 14 نيسان 2010– الإعلان عن الفائزين بأفضل مقال في العالم في الحفل الاختتامي للتجمع السادس لحركة الشباب العالمية للديمقراطية.
عملية المراجعةستقوم اللجنة الإقليمية بمراجعة المقالات واختيار ثلاث مقالات فائزة. ويتم الإعلان عن الفائزين في يوم الشباب العالمي (18 اوكتوبر). وسيتم ترجمة الثلاث مقالات الفائزة إلى اللغة الانكليزية وذلك لنشرها على الموقع الالكتروني الخاص بحركة الشباب العالمية. سيتم تققيم المقالات من خلال:· التكوين النصي· الوضوح في المعنى والكتابة· أن يكون الطرح عمليا· الإبداع
الجوائزسيحصل الخمسة عشر فائز / فائزة ( ثلاث من كل اقليم) على تغطية لكافة المصاريف لحضور التجمع السادس لحركة الشباب العالمية للديمقراطية والذي سيقام في جاكارتا عاصمة إندونيسيا في نيسان 2010. حيث سيتجمع أكثر من 500 ناشط وناشطة في مجال الديمقراطية وباحثين من أكثر من 100 دولة. وسيوفر هذا التجمع الفرصة للفائزين لحضور ورش عمل والتواصل مع مئات الناشطين والناشطات والقياديين والقياديات من مختلف دول العالم. في النهاية سيتم الاعلان عن الفائزين في مسابقة افضل مقال عن الديمقراطية في الحفل الختامي.
للمزيد من المعلومات حول حركة الشباب العالمية للديمقراطية يرجى زيارة الموقع الالكتروني
www.wymd.org . و في حالة وجود استفسار يرجى الاتصال بـسيسيليا اندرسن على البريد الالكتروني ceciliah@ned.org
حظا سعيدا، بانتظار قراءة مقالاتكم
يرجى ملاحظة أنك يجب أن تكون قد اتممت الثامنة عشر من العمر في يوم 11 نيسان 2010 لتكون قادرا على المشاركة في تجمع الحركة العالمية للديمقراطية اذا كنت من الفائزين او الفائزات الإقليميين.



مع تحيات

محمد المسقطي - عضو لجنة التحكيم الأقليمية في الحركة العالمية للديمقراطية
رئيس جمعية شباب البحرين لحقوق الإنسان
mohdmaskati@byshr.org
97336437088+

شرف العيلة !!!
من هو المسئول عن شرف العائلة ، هل هو الأب أم إلام أم الأولاد!! الذكور أم الإناث منهم ؟ و لماذا لا تقوم الأخت بقتل أبيها أذا ما قام بانتهاك ذلك الشرف ! و هل يمكن لنا التفكير بالأخر عندما يتعلق الموضوع بالشرف، هنالك العديد من الأسئلة التي يصعب لنا الإجابة عنها في موضوع شرف العائلة، و كما هي العادة في مجتمعاتنا العربية فأن الأفضل هو السكوت ، و السكوت فقط عند فتح باب النقاش حول موضوع القتل على خلفية الشرف .نعم فالطريقة الأمثل التي نقوم من خلالها بتلميع حذاء الشرف الذي ننتعله ليل نهار أمام باقي أعضاء الأسرة " الأقارب " و الأصدقاء هي اقترف مصيبة أكبر و هي القتل، فهي " الأنثى " قامت بعمل أحد الكبائر التي لا يمكن تجاوزها و بهذا يكون الحل الأمثل هو قتلها !!! ففي وطننا العربي الحبيب نسمع من فترة لأخرى عن حادثة هنا في الأردن و أخرى هناك في أحد القرى الفلسطينية، و ثالثة في سوريا و رابعة في تونس، و ما خفية أعظم في كل من مصر و السودان و الخليج العربي أما في العراق فحدث بلا حرج، فهل هو قتل على خلفية الشرف أم قتل بلا شرف. أن موضوع الشرف و العار و ما يقع بينهما ما زال يسيطر على عقلية الشباب العربي، حتى تصل به الأمور للقتل !!! و هنالك من يدافع و يقول حتى القتل ليس بقليل لتلك الفتاة ! على فرض أن هذا الخيار صحيح فلماذا لا يتم قتل الفاعل " الشاب " و ليس فقط من ارتبطت بها تاء التأنيث !! هذا السؤال حير مخيلتي كثيراً حيث أن لا أحد في السعودية أو المغرب أو حتى البنان يستطيع أن يحاسب الشاب على فعلته فيقال بأنه " طيش شباب ، و الشيطان شاطر، ... الخ " أما بنسبة لها فهي دخلت الطريق التي لم يخلق له الله خط عودة تحفظ بها الأنثى حياتها، و من قال ذلك!! أن الدين لم يقل لنا أن نقتل و بكل دم بارد، أن الدين و بالذات الإسلامي وضع العديد من القيود التي من شأنها أن لا تهدر دم إنسان، فطلب وجود أربع شهود، فإذا لم يتوفر الشهود و اليمين فأن الموضوع يكون عرضة لطعن و بتالي لعدم تطبيق الحكم " القتل " . أذا تقع هي في المحرم فيقع هو محرم أكبر منه !!! هل هذه هي الطريقة الأمثل و الأفضل للحل و لماذا نغلب العاطفة على العقل و لماذا لا نضع أنفسنا مكن تلك الفتاه و ما هي الأسباب التي أوصلتها إلى تلك المرحلة من الانحدار !! على مستوى الأخلاق ؟ و هنا ما زال الكثير من الأسئلة و الاستفسارات تتأرجح بين أفكاري بهدف الوصول إلى الحد من انتشار هذه الظاهرة و محاربتها و محاربة جذور المشكلة و هي تفشي الانعدام الخلقي في المجتمع، فكل تلك الفضائيات التي تضخ كل تلك الصور و المقاطع الإباحية و كل ما لا نتوقع أن نراه في العالم العربي، جعلت الفتاه تقلد و الشاب يغرى و تقع المصيبة فتتلوها مصيبة أكبر !! قد يكون الحل بأن نحارب الانحلال الخلقي الذي تفشى في بلادنا لكي نحارب من خلالها موضوع الشرف و بتالي موضوع القتل على خلفية الشرف !! عن أي شرف نتحدث و بعض الدول العربية اليوم ترخص دور الدعارة رسمياً و تستخدم السياحة المبنية على الجنس كأحد أهم مواردها ؟؟!
حكمة الأسبوع " أذا كان رب البيت لدف ضارباً فشيمة أهل البيت الرقصِ "
أعداد و تقديم ، جهاد شجاعية
ناشط في مجال التدريب و التنمية البشرية للشباب
مشاركة أسبوعية تأتيكم كل يوم خميس من جهاد شجاعية ، خاصة بمجموعة شباب بلا حدود الدولية في مواضيع التدريب و التنمية البشرية الشباب

Jun 24, 2009

INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP - NEW REPORT

Afghanistan’s Election Challenges

Kabul/Brussels, 24 June 2009: The enormous resources and attention now focused on Afghanistan’s elections must be channelled into strengthening the country’s political and electoral institutions.

Afghanistan’s Election Challenges,* the latest report from the International Crisis Group, evaluates the challenges of the presidential and provincial council elections in August 2009 and suggests ways to strengthen processes and institutions in the run-up to National Assembly and district elections in 2010. In particular, outstanding constitutional questions need to be resolved, and there must be a better balance between the branches of government to ensure more equitable representation and increased accountability.

Forty-one candidates for president and over three thousand candidates for the provincial councils are evidence of continued interest in the political process. However, without due attention, these polls risk being a mere collection of separate events rather than a coordinated effort feeding into wider nation building.  

“The neglect of electoral institutions and planning in the last years is symptomatic of an overall lack of institution building in Afghanistan”, says Joanna Nathan, Crisis Group Senior Analyst. “The current momentum must be used to drive strategic planning, looking forward beyond even the 2010 elections. Future polls have to be embedded in a broader democratic and institutional process”.

Elections only ever mirror wider societal trends, and the challenges that the 2009-2010 polls confront reflect the political, security and institutional developments -- and failings -- of recent years. Security conditions may make it difficult for people in areas of the south and east to exercise their franchise and could also provide the cover for mass fraud.

Technically, preparations have suffered from a failure to comprehensively build Afghan institutions, which for the first time are in sole charge of the polls, and ensure a robust legal framework and voter registry are in place to guard against fraud. Politically a highly centralised political patronage structure sees the head of state wield enormous powers, with personalities rather than policies to the fore. Such a lack of institutional development has encouraged a culture of impunity fuelling wider instability.

Ensuring the impartiality and professionalism of electoral bodies and driving security planning are essential.

“Ultimately, it is the perception of the Afghan population that will measure electoral success. If they are to be encouraged to vote, they must be confident that their ballots will count”, says Samina Ahmed, South Asia Project Director. “But if perceived to be unfairly conducted, elections could provide a potential flashpoint.”


To support our work in Asia and around the world, please click here.
*Read the full Crisis Group briefing on our website: http://www.crisisgroup.org 
Contacts: Andrew Stroehlein (Brussels) +32 (0) 2 541 1635
              Kimberly Abbott (Washington) +1 202 785 1601
To contact Crisis Group media please click here
 

The International Crisis Group (Crisis Group) is an independent, non-profit, non-governmental organisation covering some 60 crisis-affected countries and territories across four continents, working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict.

Unresolved Gaza crisis hampering efforts to advance Mid-east peace – UN envoy

Robert H. Serry, Special Coordinator for Middle East Peace Process23 June 2009 – As members of the diplomatic Quartet prepare to meet in Italy on Friday as part of ongoing efforts to promote peace in the Middle East, the top United Nations envoy to the region said today that a commitment by both Israel and the Palestinians to change the dynamics in Gaza is vital.
“The unresolved crisis in Gaza has negative repercussions on all efforts to advance the peace process, and wreaks unacceptable havoc on the fabric of civilian life in Gaza,” Robert Serry, UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, said in a briefing to the Security Council.
The situation in Gaza – which recently endured a devastating Israeli offensive with the stated goal of ending rocket fire into its southern territory – will be among the issues discussed at the 26 June meeting in Trieste, Italy, which will be attended by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and other members of the Quartet, which comprises the UN, European Union, Russia and United States.
“We need both Israeli and Palestinian Governments clearly committed to a two-State solution achieved peacefully through negotiations on all core issues… and to changing the dynamics in Gaza,” said the Special Coordinator.
Mr. Serry reported a “notable and welcome” drop in violence over the past month, as well as continuing efforts to prevent the re-supply of illicit weapons to militants in Gaza, including Egyptian efforts to close down tunnels and confiscate explosives.
At the same time, conditions for the civilian population remain of grave concern, he said. Food and medicines are entering Gaza, but the overall quantity and range of goods remains “grossly insufficient” to support normal economic and social activity.
He added that it is completely unacceptable that no reconstruction materials are allowed into Gaza, when an entire civilian population was trapped in a war zone and given the scale of damage caused by Israel’s military operation earlier this year.
Last month, Maxwell Gaylard, the top UN humanitarian official in the occupied Palestinian territory, said the fighting from December 2008 to January 2009 had destroyed some 4,000 homes and damaged another 40,000, and although donor countries have pledged billions of dollars for Gaza’s reconstruction, it cannot begin because of the ongoing Israeli blockade.
Mr. Serry today noted that Security Council resolution 1860, which called for an end to the fighting earlier this year, specified the key challenges that must be met if a “different and more positive” strategy on Gaza is to emerge.
“I believe there is now an emerging opportunity to begin shifting the dynamics.”
News Tracker: past stories on this issue
Secretary-General calls again on Israel to ease Gaza blockade
HIGHLIGHTS OF U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL BAN KI-MOON'S
PRESS ENCOUNTER WITH N.Y. MAYOR BLOOMBERG
DAG HAMMARSKJOLD PARK, NEW YORK
Tuesday, June 23, 2009

(There was no noon briefing today)


BAN KI-MOON ANNOUNCES CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT OF THE UNITED NATIONS


SECRETARY-GENERAL BAN KI-MOON: Thank you very much, Mr. Howard. Mr. Mayor [Michael Bloomberg] and Mr. [Paul] Dickinson [CEO, Carbon Disclosure Project], ladies and gentleman, citizens of New York. Good afternoon. It’s a great pleasure for me to participate in this very meaningful event and particularly to be joined by distinguished Mayor Bloomberg of New York and other civic leaders.We are here for one reason: to push for urgent action on climate change from world leaders, from civic leaders and from everyone, every citizen of the world, including New York City. Climate change is the greatest challenge facing this and future generations. Much more for future generation: your daughters and sons and your grandchildren. Emissions are rising and the clock is ticking.That is why I am going to convene an unprecedented Climate Change Summit of the United Nations here at UN Headquarters on 22 September. I appeal to all the world’s leaders to participate and make their contribution and make their commitment and give clear instructions to the negotiators on climate change. According to the world’s leading scientists, we have less than ten years to halt the rise in greenhouse gas emissions, if we are to avoid catastrophic consequences for people and the planet. Now is the time for action. This year we have an unprecedented opportunity to change course and retool our economies to generate green growth, green jobs for a lasting recovery. In December, the world’s governments will gather in Copenhagen, Denmark, to negotiate a new global climate agreement. If we are to “seal a deal” in Copenhagen, we need to be bold and ambitious and visionary. And therefore we need the full support and commitment of the visionary global leaders at the highest level. The United Nations can highlight the imperative for action. We can mobilize support and facilitate the negotiations.But, in the end, it is the Parliaments, the Presidents and Prime Ministers and Ministers and governors and mayors of the world that have to act. The difficult but necessary policy choices facing us today can only be made by them. And I count on the leadership and commitment of Mayor Bloomberg. That is why I am here.And also that is why I am inviting the Heads of State and Government from every country in the world to the United Nations Headquarters on 22 September. I am counting on all leaders to attend again, whether they are from countries with the highest emissions or from those suffering most acutely from the effects, including those small island developing countries, landlocked countries and least developed countries.The goal of the Climate Change [Summit] is to mobilize the political momentum needed to seal the deal in Copenhagen on a fair, effective and scientifically ambitious new climate framework.We have a lot of work to do, and not a lot of time. This is the time to act.So far, the response by the world’s governments has been less than sufficient. I hope that working together, the world’s leaders will signal their determination to resolve all final obstacles. I want this Climate Summit to help them seal the deal. All nations, and all leaders, have a stake in a successful outcome in Copenhagen. Climate change involves everyone.That’s what the United Nation’s “seal the deal” campaign is all about: mobilizing support across the globe.To put it simply: If we want a climate change agreement in December, we need action today.We need action from the grassroots, from religious groups and young people, from Main Street to Wall Street and beyond. That is why I am pleased to join forces with the City of New York and the NGO [Non-Governmental Organization] community to launch Climate Week NYC, which will be held throughout the week of the Summit. It is also why I am pleased to be joined by the Mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg. Mayor Bloomberg has taken important steps to build a green economy right here in New York City. He is a leading voice on this issue. And I count on your support, your cooperation, your participation. And most importantly, I count on the visionary leadership of Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Thank you very much. Q: [inaudible]SG: This is a very important part of our negotiation. This climate change negotiation and addressing all these issues, in fact, should be led by the industrialized countries in view of their historical responsibilities. But what they need to do is, in terms of providing technology, in terms of providing financing support, the industrialized countries should take much more attention and support to developing countries - the most vulnerable countries, including least developing countries, land-locked countries and small island developing countries. I have been working very hard to mobilize political will as well as financial and technological support for these developing countries. That will be one of the very important elements to make these negotiations a success.Q: Somebody said that business is willing and able and ready to take care of global warming. Didn’t they cause it in the first place?SG: In addressing this global warming phenomenon, it is vitally important that governments, the business community and the civil community cooperate. We need this tripartite partnership working together. In fact, business participation, particularly [by] CEOs, is crucially important. I have been meeting a group of CEOs during the last two and a half years; in parallel with my own efforts to talk with government leaders, business leaders’ participation is very important. The United Nations has established a very important initiative called the Global Compact. These business leaders have taken the initiative [in a project] called “Caring for Climate”. This is an initiative done by business leaders [with whom] I have been working very closely. Participation of business CEOs during the September 22nd summit will be a very important part. And I am also considering inviting Mayor Bloomberg, if his schedule permits. I know that he is a very busy leader, but let us see. I think a contribution by such a distinguished mayor of New York City, one of the biggest cities in the world -- that will give a very good example of how mayors and governors and local government leaders can lead by example. Thank you very much.

OTHER DEVELOPMENTS IN THE U.N. SYSTEM

BAN KI-MOON EXPRESSES DISMAY AT POST-ELECTION VIOLENCE IN IRAN
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, in a statement issued Monday afternoon, expressed his growing concern at the situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran and his dismay at the post-election violence, particularly the use of force against civilians, which has led to the loss of life and injuries.
He calls on the authorities to respect fundamental civil and political rights, especially the freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of information.
The situation in Iran is of concern to the international community, and the Secretary-General calls on the Government and the opposition to resolve peacefully their differences through dialogue and legal means.
He urges an immediate stop to the arrests, threats and use of force.
'The Secretary-General reiterates his hope that the democratic will of the people of Iran will be fully respected.
GOLAN HEIGHTS FORCE EXTENDED; SECURITY COUNCIL DISCUSSES GUINEA-BISSAU, MIDDLE EAST
The Security Council began its work on Tuesday by voting unanimously to extend the mandate of the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) in the Golan Heights by six months.
The Council then heard a briefing by Joseph Mutaboba, the Secretary-General's Representative for Guinea-Bissau and head of the UN Peace-building Support Office in Guinea-Bissau. He discussed the latest report on the country, which, among other things, recommends that Guinea-Bissau consider a number of measures, including a credible commission of inquiry, to end the cycles of violence and impunity there.
Mutaboba briefed the council on the continuing political and military tensions following the recent assassinations of President Nino Vieira, the Military Chief of General Staff, General Tagme Na Waie, and a number of top political leaders.
He described the general situation as fragile and insecure, with a high degree of mistrust and skepticism because of the assassinations. Mutaboba added that though the setting is not ideal for peaceful elections, the interim president, Raimundo Pereira, has reaffirmed that presidential elections scheduled for Sunday, June 28, would go ahead.
He further stated that the United Nations is working with the Economic Community of West African States, ECOWAS, and the African Union to assist the Government of Guinea-Bissau in its investigation into the double assassinations of the president and the military chief.
“Continued instability is the desire of spoilers who benefit from a weak state and organised crime and drug trafficking,” Mutaboba said, as he called on the international community to stay engaged with its much-needed support, especially for the conduct of the presidential elections.
Also briefing the Council, and echoing many of Mr. Mutaboba’s concerns, was Luiza Ribeiro Viotti (Brazil), Chair of the Guinea-Bissau configuration of the Peacebuilding Commission. She stressed that every effort must be made to ensure that the 28 June elections were free, fair and transparent. If properly conducted, the vote might pave the way for a true dialogue among the main political forces, which was crucial for peacebuilding.
This afternoon, the Security Council will receive a briefing on the situation in the Middle East by the UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, Robert Serry.
ENVOY TO CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC VOICES DEEPLY CONCERN ABOUT ATTACKS IN NORTHEAST
The Mission in Chad and the Central African Republic (MINURCAT) is deeply concerned about the spiraling violence in the northeastern Vakaga region of the CAR. That region is home to an estimated 60,000 civilians in acute need of humanitarian assistance.
The Secretary-General’s Special Representative, Victor Angelo, was in Bangui yesterday for urgent consultations with the country’s leadership on how respond to the worsening security situation in the northeast. He later said that the discussions included consideration of a stronger UN presence to contain the violence and help resolve the conflict there.
Meanwhile, humanitarian personnel have been evacuated from local hub of Birao following a Sunday attack on a government base there, says the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). OCHA says the attacks have caused most of the civilian population to flee; 3 civilians and 6 soldiers were wounded, and more than 100 homes set on fire. A June 6 attack had left scores wounded, many houses burned to the ground, and some 1500 people homeless.
OCHA views the attacks as reflecting mounting tension between local ethnic groups, including some allied to the Union of Democratic Forces for Unity (UNFDR), a key signatory of the peace agreement.
Despite a small peacekeeping deployment near Birao, repeated violence and the peacekeepers’ limited access to patrol helicopters and other resources means that it is hard to ensure continued protection of civilians.
Meanwhile, as of today, only 41 percent of the requested $116 million in humanitarian assistance for the Central African Republic has been received, OCHA noted.
LIBERIA: PANEL OF EXPERTS RELEASE MID-TERM REPORT
The midterm report of the Panel of Experts on Liberia has been released today.
In the report, the panel deals with the Security Council’s arms embargo on Liberia and a review of the lifting of the embargoes on the export of diamonds and timber. In addition the panel reviewed the Council’s travel ban and assets freeze imposed on certain individuals associated with former President Charles Taylor, who’s currently on trial in The Hague on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The panel says that it is investigating allegations of unapproved travel by individuals under the Council’s travel ban. It also reports that the Government of Liberia has issued at least four passports, including a diplomatic one to listed individuals. Among its recommendations the panel suggests that implementation of the travel ban could be particularly enhanced through collaboration with organisations such as INTERPOL.
On the subject of timber and diamonds the panel recommends that the Security Council should continue to mandate the UN Mission in Liberia, (UNMIL), to assist the Government in establishing proper administration of its natural resources and authority in the areas of mining and forestry.
CAMBODIA CO-PROSECUTOR RESIGNS
Robert Petit, the International Co-Prosecutor for the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, issued a statement expressing his regret that, for personal and family reasons, he will resign from his post, effective 1 September 2009.
"It has been the greatest privilege of my career to have the opportunity to bring some justice to the victims of the crimes of the Khmer Rouge," he said. "I remain convinced that Cambodia's hopes for a better future lie, in part, on true accountability for crimes." Petit expressed his belief that Deputy Prosecutor William Smith and his staff, along with their Cambodian colleagues, will continue to pursue that goal following his departure.
BAN KI-MOON LAUDS EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC SERVICE
The Secretary-General today addressed the seventh UN Public Service Day Awards Ceremony.
During that ceremony, public institutions from around the world were recognized for the impact that their services have on the day-to-day lives of ordinary people. In his remarks, the Secretary-General said the UN has long recognized that effective governance and efficient public administration are central to the global development agenda.
The ingredients are simple: commitment, hard work, innovation, talent and technological know-how. Combined, they make a powerful recipe, he said.
THREE AFGHANS WORKING AS U.N. PARTNERS KILLED
Three Afghan staff of a local non-governmental organization, Development and Humanitarian Services for Afghanistan (DHSA), were killed today when their vehicle hit an improvised explosive device in Jowzjan Province. DHSA is a partner of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR).
WORLD DRUG REPORT 2009 TO BE LAUNCHED IN WASHINGTON TOMORROW
The World Drug Report 2009, the flagship publication of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), will be launched in Washington DC tomorrow by UNODC Executive Director, Antonio Maria Costa, together with the newly appointed Director of the United States Office of National Drug Control Policy, Gil Kerlikowske.
The Report, presented in the run up to World Drug Day on 26th June, notes that despite huge efforts made by countries and partners, the production, trafficking and consumption of illicit drugs still represent serious challenges to human security.
While there are positive trends in Southeast Asia such as a likely drop in opium consumption and a leveling of poppy cultivation, the data highlights the growing issue of amphetamine-type stimulants production, trafficking and consumption, and the continuing prevalence of heroin use in East Asia.
The report represents the anti-narcotics body’s yearly effort to raise understanding of the state of global drug markets and to enhance responses by Member States to the threats they represent.
WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE OPENS
The 33rd session of the World Heritage Committee, opened today in Seville, Spain. During the session, which ends on June 30, the Committee´s 21 members will review the state of conservation of properties inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List and 27 nominations for new inscriptions of cultural and natural sites on the List.

Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-GeneralUnited Nations, S-378New York, NY 10017Tel. 212-963-7162Fax. 212-963-7055
Back to the Spokesperson's Page

Jun 22, 2009

INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP - NEW BRIEFING
Georgia-Russia: Still Insecure and Dangerous Tbilisi/Brussels, 22 June 2009: Russian diplomatic pressure is dismantling the critical international conflict resolution machinery in Georgia, leaving the region facing a potentially explosive situation in which even a small incident could spark new fighting.Georgia-Russia: Still Insecure and Dangerous,* the latest policy briefing from the International Crisis Group, examines the situation ten months after the August 2008 war and finds deep cause for concern. Moscow’s 15 June Security Council veto of an extension of the sixteen-year-old UN observer mission’s mandate in Georgia and Abkhazia and its apparent intention to require the removal of the mission of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) by 30 June are blows to regional security that will fuel tensions.“With both the UN and OSCE missions given the chop, there will be no independent observers around the conflict zones of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, and there will be no mechanism for ensuring that minor incidents don’t deteriorate into wider fighting”, says Lawrence Sheets, Crisis Group’s Caucasus Project Director. “Russia’s actions have created a hugely hazardous atmosphere. Moscow needs to review its policy and work for a reasonable compromise allowing the UN and OSCE monitors to continue their important work”. The Georgia-Russia war ended with ceasefire agreements that required an end to military action, a pull-back to pre-war positions and access for humanitarian and monitoring missions to conflict areas. But Russia has not complied with key aspects of the deal that President Dimitri Medvedev reached in August/September 2008 with French President Nicolas Sarkozy in his then-EU presidency role. The security situation on the ground today remains tense. Neither side has engaged in meaningful negotiations to stabilise the region. Russia says it is acting at the request of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which do not trust international observers. But Moscow has legal obligations to do more for the security and safety of local populations, regardless of ethnicity, and to prevent human rights abuses in areas that are in effect under its control. Most importantly, it must expand efforts to allow the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs), especially the approximately 25,000 ethnic Georgians who have been unable to go back to their homes in South Ossetia.Russia not only keeps excessive troop levels in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, in contravention of the ceasefire agreements, but has also increased their numbers and fortified bases to demarcate, in effect, the administrative borders between Georgia and the regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, both of which it has recognised as independent states. Its policy of preventing international monitors access to those areas undermines stability and conflict resolution efforts. It should use its dominant influence to allow monitors access, facilitate IDP return and encourage South Ossetia and Abkhazia to engage in genuine negotiations with Tbilisi.“If the UN and OSCE missions do indeed leave Georgia, as Russia seems to desire, it will deepen regional tensions”, says Alain Deletroz, Crisis Group’s Vice President for Europe. “Rather than prompt further instability, Moscow should take a responsible approach that encourages internationally recognised institutions of conflict prevention and resolution to work freely on the ground. Another war and another IDP crisis in the Caucasus are not in anyone’s interest”.

To support our work in Europe and around the world, please click here.*Read the full Crisis Group briefing on our website: http://www.crisisgroup.org Contacts: Andrew Stroehlein (Brussels) +32 (0) 2 541 1635 Kimberly Abbott (Washington) +1 202 785 1601To contact Crisis Group media please click here

The International Crisis Group (Crisis Group) is an independent, non-profit, non-governmental organisation covering some 60 crisis-affected countries and territories across four continents, working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict.

New York Times


Monday, June 22, 2009

Newsha Tavakolian/Polaris
Updated: June 17, 2009

Iran has had a quasi theocracy since the ouster of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi in the Islamic Revolution of 1979. In June 2009, widespread protests over the results of a presidential election grew into the greatest challenge to its authority that the Shiite regime has faced.
On June 13, 2009, after an unusually bitter campaign, the authorities announced that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had been reelected. The announcement of his victory -- in which it was said that he had received more than 60 percent of the vote -- prompted mass protests by demonstrators who claimed that he had stolen the election. Mr. Admadinejad's main challenger, Mir Hussein Moussavi, a former prime minister with a reputation for honesty and competence, rejected the results and called on supporters and fellow clerics to fight them. In the final weeks of the race, Mr. Moussavi's campaign had gained tremendous energy, and huge rallies by his supporters had packed the streets of Tehran day and night.
Initially, Mr. Ahmadinejad and the country's supreme ruler, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, brushed off the outraged reaction to the results. But in the face of massive demonstrations, two days later Mr. Khamenei called for a high-level inquiry into accusations of election irregularities. But that failed to appease the protesters, as did an offer the next day to conduct a partial recount. Thousands of both pro- and anti-government demonstrators gathered in the streets, increasing tensions. Clashes with members of the Revolutionary Guards and their militia supporters left at least seven people dead during the largest antigovernment demonstrations since the Iranian revolution.
The turmoil comes after a period in which the country's stature in the Middle East has grown but discontent has crept up internally. The greater prominence in the region comes as a result of a combination of factors: the American invasion of Iraq, which ousted Saddam Hussein, a longtime enemy, and replaced him with a friendly Shiite government; the rise in oil prices between 2001 and 2008; and its aggressive foreign policy, which included support for radical groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian territories. The country's nuclear power program is another source of international tension, leading the United Nations Security Council to impose sanctions after Iran ignored its order to halt the enrichment of uranium. Internally, the hard-line clerics who control the government tightened their hold after
Mr. Ahmadinejad, a conservative, succeeded Mohammad Khatami, a moderate, as president in 2005. Much of the economy is propped up by the country's rich oil reserves, and lower export prices have led to mounting criticism of Mr. Ahmadinejad.

The Nuclear Challenge
Mr. Ahmadinejad has sought to rally support by defiance of the West and the United States over
Iran's nuclear program. In 2003, under President Khatami, Iran admitted that it had been cladestinely pursuing an atomic program and agreed to suspend it. In 2006, the country restarted a nuclear research program that it insisted was purely for peaceful purposes.
It defied a series of Security Council resolutions calling for a halt, and rebuffed diplomatic overtures from Europe and the United States. In May 2007 international inspectors reported that the country's scientists had mastered the process of enrichment, in which uranium is concentrated to the levels needed for power generation or, eventually, for an atomic bomb.
Late that year, American intelligence agencies issued a new National Intelligence Estimate that concluded that the weapons portion of the Iranian nuclear program remained on hold. Contradicting the assessment made in 2005, the report stated that the Iranian government did not appear determined to obtain nuclear weapons, although it said Iran's intentions were unclear, and that the country probably could not produce a bomb until the middle of the next decade.
On May 20, 2009, Iran test fired an upgraded surface-to-surface missile with a range of about 1,200 miles. The reported range of the Sejil-2 missile would put it within striking distance of Israel and of American bases in the Persian Gulf. The launch would appear to represent Iran's first successful test of a solid-fuel missile, which would be much more mobile and easier to hide than their current generation of liquid-fueled rockets. Until now, the country's longest-range missile has been the liquid-fueled Shahab-3, which is based on a design that it obtained from North Korea.
American officials and international inspectors are concerned that Iran seems to have made significant progress in the three technonologies necessary to field an effective nuclear weapon: enriching uranium to weapons grade; developing a missile capable of reaching Israel and parts of Western Europe; and designing a warhead that will fit on the missile.
The greatest mystery surrounds the warhead program, which intelligence agencies said in late 2007 had been halted at the end of 2003. It is unclear whether Iran has restarted its weaponization program.
Relations with the U.S. and Israel
Mr. Ahmadinejad has often denounced Israel. In 2008, President Bush deflected a secret request by Israel for specialized bunker-busting bombs it wanted for an attack on Iran's main nuclear complex and told the Israelis that he had authorized new covert action intended to sabotage Iran's suspected effort to develop nuclear weapons, according to senior American and foreign officials.
Tensions between Washington and Tehran -- which go back many decades, from Washington's participation in the 1953 coup that installed the shah, to the seizure of American diplomats in 1979 after the shah fell to an Islamic revolution -- also rose in 2007 and 2008 over Iran's involvement in Iraq. American military officials accused elements of Iran's Revolutionary Guard of supplying Shiite militants in Iraq with powerful roadside bombs to use against American forces.
During the 2008 American presidential campaign, Barack Obama broke with rival candidates to say he favored unconditional talks with Iran, though he condemned its nuclear program. In his first interview after taking office, on Al Arabiya television, an Arabic-language channel based in Dubai, Mr. Obama said that "if countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us."
President Ahmadinejad responded by calling for an apology for decades of American misdeeds, but did not explicitly reject the overture. The move signaled the start of a long-delayed war-or-peace drama that may help define the Obama administration's plans to remake America's approach to diplomacy, but could cause problems between the U.S. and Israel.
The 2009 Presidential Election
The major candidates in the hotly disputed 2009 presidential election were the incumbent, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and Mir Hussein Moussavi, a former prime minister.
Mr. Moussavi's moderate views won him support from other reformers in Iran, including former President Mohammad Khatami. Public rallies in his support were of unexpected size and enthusiasm. The leading candidates exchanged accusations that were extraordinarily fierce for Iranian politics.
In early June, the presidential campaign reached a level of passion and acrimony almost unheard of in Iran. In part, that appeared to be because of a surge of energy in Mr. Moussavi's campaign. Rallies for Mr. Moussavi drew tens of thousands of people, and an unofficial poll suggested his support had markedly increased, with 54 percent of respondents saying they would vote for him compared with 39 percent for Mr. Ahmadinejad.
Many Iranians said the campaign's raucous tone was due largely to Mr. Ahmadinejad's unexpectedly fierce rhetorical attacks, which infuriated his rivals and their supporters, and drew some blistering ripostes.
Many observers said a critical moment was a nationally televised debate on June 3, in which the president opened with a furious attack on Mr. Moussavi. Mr. Ahmadinejad seemed to spare no one, accusing his conservative and liberal opponents of being corrupt. The most shocking thrust, to some viewers, was when he held up a document with a small picture of Mr. Moussavi's wife, Zahra Rahnavard, and asked him in a derisive tone, "Do you know this woman?" Mr. Ahmadinejad then accused Ms. Rahnavard - a respected professor of political science - of entering a graduate program without taking the entrance exam and other, lesser violations of university policy. Ms. Rahnavard held a news conference in which she threatened to sue if Mr. Ahmadinejad did not apologize.
Mr. Moussavi served as prime minister from 1980 to 1988. He is well remembered by many Iranians for managing the country during its eight-year war with Iraq, and for introducing food rationing.
An architect and painter, he has not held a government post since the Constitution was amended to eliminate the position of prime minister in 1989.
After Mr. Moussavi announced in March 2009 that he intended to stand in the June election, Mr. Khatami, a leading moderate candidate, withdrew from the race. Aides said he quit so as not to split the vote against Mr. Ahmadinejad.
Mr. Moussavi has said that he favors freedoms of speech and the press and would try to change the law that bans private television stations.
But he has also said he would not back down from the country's nuclear program, which began during his tenure as prime minister. Instead, he said, he would try to build international confidence that Iran's nuclear ambitions were peaceful.
"Weaponization and nuclear technology are two separate issues, and we should not let them get mixed up," he said.
Mr. Ahmadinejad was elected president of Iran in June 2005 on a mandate to distribute the country's growing oil income among the poor. The son of a blacksmith, he was an unknown figure in the country's politics who had only served as Tehran's mayor for two years and earlier as a provincial governor for four years. But with the support of the country's religious and military circles -- who had been frustrated with the policies of Mr. Khatami, his moderate predecessor, Mr. Ahmadinejad appealed to a large rural constituency who voted for him in hope for economic change.
But Mr. Ahmadinejad soon became known on the international stage as the face of Iran's defiance over its nuclear program and hostility towards Israel. He shocked the world when he called the Holocaust a "myth' and repeated an old slogan from the early days of the 1979 revolution, saying "Israel must be wiped off the map."
After his election, Iran broke the United Nation's nuclear agency seals on its nuclear facility and resumed sensitive enrichment activities - a process that can be used for making nuclear bomb or nuclear fuel. Iran contends that its program is peaceful and that it merely wants to produce fuel for its nuclear power plants. But because of secretive past activities, the United States and some European countries accuse Iran of having a clandestine weapons program. The country has been the target of three sets of United Nations Security Council sanctions over its program.
In the last few years, the country has been hit by high inflation, soaring unemployment and unrest. In recent months, lower export prices of oil lessened Mr. Ahmadinejad's popularity.
Before the voting, supporters of Mr. Moussavi were hopeful, given the large and energetic crowds that had been turning out at his rallies. But then on June 13, the day after the voting, Mr. Ahmadinejad was declared the winner, with 63 percent of the vote to 35 percent for Mr. Moussavi.
On June 15, in an unusual radio address broadcast every 15 minutes, Ayatollah Khamenei was quoted as telling Mr. Moussavi to pursue his objections to the election result calmly and legally. The broadcast said that at a meeting on June 14, Mr. Khamenei told Mr. Moussavi, "Naturally, in this election, complaints should be followed through legal channels" adding that Mr. Khamenei told Mr. Moussavi to "follow the issue calmly."
On June 15, the ayatollah called for the vote to be examined in a turnabout from the government's earlier position that the vote had been free and fair. Mr. Khamenei had instructed the powerful Guardian Council to examine opposition complaints of widespread electoral irregularities. The council, in its ruling the following day, said the law prevented it from voiding the last vote and holding a new one.
The council later announced that it was prepared to order only a partial recount, according to state television and news reports. Mr. Moussavi and other opponents of Mr. Admadinejad rejected the proposal.
By June 17, Iran had expanded a crackdown on journalists and for the first time directly accused the United States of interference in the disputed presidential election.
President Obama said a day earlier that it would be counterproductive for the United States "to be seen as meddling." But he also said he was "deeply troubled by the violence" and that democratic values needed to be observed.
Mr. Moussavi, in a message on a
Web site associated with him, called on his supporters to rally again on June 18, and to go to their local mosques to mourn protesters killed in the demonstrations. His call directly challenged Ayatollah Khamenei, who had urged him to work through the country's electoral system in contesting what was declared a landslide victory for Mr. Admadinejad.

Jun 15, 2009

Andy: Don't Throw It Away! - CBS News

Andy: Don't Throw It Away! - CBS News

Shared via AddThis

Jun 8, 2009

washingtonpost.com
ad_iconYour Ad Here

Lebanon Retains Coalition Leadership

By Howard Schneider and Alia Ibrahim
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, June 8, 2009 

BEIRUT, June 8 -- Heavy turnout in Christian districts returned to power a Western-backed coalition in the Lebanese parliament on Sunday, thwarting a bid by the Islamist Hezbollah party to increase its influence.

Preliminary results Monday showed that the March 14 coalition of Sunni Muslims and Christians won at least 70 seats in the country's 128-member parliament. The group currently holds 70 seats, but vote-counting in several closely contested districts continued through the early morning and could add to the total.

In brief victory remarks, coalition leader Saad Hariri said the country's competing factions must "give a hand to each other and have the will to go back to work." Hariri is the son of former prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri, a Sunni whose 2005 assassination helped sweep the March 14 group to power.

The result will be welcomed in Washington as President Obama renews a push for Arab-Israeli peace. Victory for a Hezbollah-led coalition would have been a setback to those efforts and a boost for the group's patrons in Syria and Iran.

An alliance between Hezbollah and Maronite Christian leader Michel Aoun had campaigned on a platform of economic reform and maintaining Hezbollah's tough stance on Israel.

But the events of the past few years, voters said, made the campaign a broad referendum on Hezbollah. The group's militia in 2008 briefly seized control of downtown Beirut in a bid to boost Hezbollah's political power, a move reminiscent of the country's 15-year civil war. And Hezbollah's 2006 war with Israel was cited by some voters as showing the danger of allowing the group to keep its arms stockpiles.

In a statement to Agence France-Presse, Hezbollah member of parliament Hassan Fadlallah did not acknowledge the group's defeat, but said it was important that Lebanon "turn a new page, one based on partnership, cooperation and understanding."

Turnout topped 60 percent in some heavily contested Christian areas, as thousands of expatriate Lebanese traveled to the country to vote under rules that require people to cast ballots in their home towns. Under Lebanon's system, designed to maintain peace among the country's religious groups, seats are apportioned among 18 sects. The Muslims and Christians each receive half of the total.

It remains unclear how far the vote will go toward resolving Lebanon's political stalemate, with a pro-Western government stymied by a strong Hezbollah-led opposition.

Negotiations over the distribution of cabinet positions in a new government will test the country's ability to satisfy Hezbollah's expected demands, while also acknowledging the outcome of the election.

The battle was fought largely in Christian areas, including the Metn, north of Beirut, where Aoun's pro-Hezbollah slate vied against the March 14 group.

"This is our first election that is not just about a family or a name," said lawyer Raif Akl, referring to the heavy influence of family ties on political loyalties in the country. "It's about a political future."

Akl was helping staff the campaign office of Sami Gemayel, scion of one of Lebanon's main Christian political families and a backer of the March 14 slate of candidates.

The group includes the main Sunni Muslim parties, led by Hariri's son, and several smaller Christian groups. They form the majority in the Lebanese parliament.

They were opposed by a slate that included Hezbollah, the Shiite Amal party and Aoun's Free Patriotic Movement. Aoun, exiled in France until 2005 because of a clash with neighboring Syria, formed an alliance with Hezbollah upon his return.

The contests for many of the parliamentary seats were not considered competitive. Before the results were known, Lebanese political analysts said the outcome in a handful of mostly Christian districts, accounting for fewer than two dozen seats, would determine whether either faction had enough of a majority to claim a mandate.

The vote took place under tight security and a broad set of rules meant to limit the potential for violence or electoral abuses. Restaurants and clubs were closed early on Saturday night; motor vehicle traffic was restricted. Army and police forces began deploying a day in advance.

Thousands of election observers were stationed to monitor polling places, with a text-messaging system set up to report possible problems to a public Web site.


© 2009 The Washington Post Company








www.moim.gov.lb           >>
إشترك في النشرة
Download PDF
أعداد سابقة
كلمة الوزير 

تعدّدت الوسائل... والديمقراطية واحدة 

في أزمنة أخرى، كانت ساحة البلدة تحمل أصوات المرشحين إلى الناس، أو ربما باحة الكنيسة أو المسجد أو الحسينية... 

في أزمنة أخرى، كان التواصل بين الناخب والمرشّح على هدى العلاقة الشخصية. هذا طبيب يشفي مريضا فيتحول الشافي مرشحا والمشفي ناخبا، وذاك شيخ صلح يجمع متخاصمين فما يلبثوا أن يصوّتوا له عرفانا، وذانك ورث خدمة الناس عن جدّه فاستمرّ حاملا إرثه تحت القبة.
وفي أزمنة أخرى أيضا، وسائل عدة تقليدية في "تسويق" المرشح، وصور بالأسود والأبيض...

أما اليوم، فأزمنة أخرى.

أزمنة البوابات الرقمية المفتوحة والقرية الكونية. أزمنة تحوّلت فيها ساحة البلدة إلى مساحة عالمية، عبر أثير رقمي يربط إبن البلدة هنا، في ساحته، بابن عمّه هناك، في سيدني، بلمحة "كبسة زر".

وكما الأزمنة، كذلك التواصل الانتخابي. تعدّدت الوسائل وتبقى الديمقراطية واحدة. وها إن وزارة الداخلية والبلديات تواكب الحالة التواصلية المستجدة من خلال استحداث موقع إلكتروني خاص بالانتخابات، لن يتوقف عند حدود استحقاق 2009، وإنما سيكون عنوانا لزيارات مواطنية متكررة في كل استحقاق إنتخابي. عنوان يتردد إليه – أو عليه- كل باحث عن معلومة أو خبر أو استيضاح. وستذهب الوزارة أيضا إلى الناس عبره لتدق بابهم الإلكتروني. وقد سبق لهذه الوزارة، بالإضافة إلى موقعها الإلكتروني الرسمي، أن أطلقت موقعا خاصا بقوائم الناخبين، نعتقد أنه ساهم مساهمة فاعلة في تنقيح اللوائح، بعد أن دخله أكثر من 4.700.000 زائر في أقل من شهرين.

فإلى أزمنة أخرى وبوابات تواصل أخرى يكون عنوانها الدائم ديمقراطية تبحث عن الناس، من أجل الناس، من أجل أزمنة أفضل...

زيـاد بـارود
وزير الداخلية والبلديات



نشاطات 
 
جميع الحقوق محفوظة 2009

INSTANT VIEW: Hezbollah camp loses Lebanon election

Sun Jun 7, 2009 6:52pm EDT
 

BEIRUT (Reuters) - An anti-Syrian coalition, known as "March 14," defeated the "March 8" alliance composed of Hezbollah and its allies in Lebanon's parliamentary election on Sunday, politicians on both sides said.

Following is reaction from Lebanese politicians:

SAAD AL-HARIRI, LEADER OF ANTI-SYRIAN COALITION

Congratulations to Lebanon, congratulations to democracy, congratulations to freedom. The Lebanese have proved today their commitment to freedom and democracy. There are no winners and losers in this election, the only winner is democracy and the biggest winner is Lebanon.

LEBANESE PRIME MINISTER FOUAD SINIORA, MARCH 14

On his Sidon victory: "I dedicate this victory, God willing, to Lebanon and the Lebanese and the soul of the martyr Rafik al-Hariri."

I was leaning toward thinking that there is a majority that will be preserved and may achieve more gains. I believe that we have made steps forward and the most important thing to consider is ... to act humbly and this is what should judge the future performance, embrace all of the nation's people to take our country to the future.

HEZBOLLAH MP, HASSAN FADLALLAH, MARCH 8

We consider that Lebanon is ruled by partnership and whatever the results of the elections are, we cannot change the standing delicate balances or repeat the experiences of the past which led to catastrophes on Lebanon and showed the inability of one party monopolizing power. Whoever wants political stability, the preservation of national unity and the resurrection of Lebanon will find no choice but to accept the principle of consensus.

LEBANESE DRUZE LEADER, WALID JUMBLATT, MARCH 14

We should not forget that the elections should be a boost to the dialogue and we should not try to isolate the other parties.

INFORMATION MINISTER TAREQ MITRI, MARCH 14

For March 14, an electoral victory no matter how small the majority or large, means that the basic fundamental principles that have created this movement are still valued by the Lebanese and that this is a vote in favor of Lebanon's independence and that people don't want to see Lebanon continue being a battleground for wars and tensions in the region and the world.

It shows that there was a democratic process, the democratic system in spite of all difficulties we have seen in last few years, the democratic system of Lebanon, is viable and that a large number of Lebanese are committed to democracy.

(Compiled by Yara Bayoumy)